Rival models cross-check every answer before you see it
Frontier models answer your question independently, then argue over each other's reasoning until they agree. You get one answer, along with the full rationale behind it.
300 free credits. No credit card.
Legal research (source: 1011 Now, Nebraska, opens in a new tab)
Here are the precedents that support your appeal.
Opposing counsel flagged 57 of the brief's 63 citations, and the court struck it and ruled against the client. The lawyer was suspended from practicing law.
Medical research (source: OECD AI Incidents Monitor, opens in a new tab)
Old left basilar ganglia infarct.
The term merges two separate parts of the brain, and it appeared in a published research paper. A doctor could not tell which stroke the scan showed.
Consulting report (source: Associated Press via CTV News, opens in a new tab)
Sources and citations attached.
Reviewers found citations to academic papers that do not exist and a quote the report made up. The firm refunded part of its A$440,000 government contract.
A single model has nothing checking its work, so it states a wrong answer with the same confidence as a right one.
In Vurge, rival models review each other's reasoning before you see an answer.
Frontier models answer on their own, then review each other until they agree. After every round, you see whether each model defended its position, refined it, or changed its mind.
Every change of position cites the points from other models that caused it, so you can check the reasoning yourself before you rely on the answer.
Here, three models disagree on where to store user sessions and agree by round three.
Review drops the weak claims before you see the answer, so you ask fewer follow‑up questions.
"The output is great. It was more complete than Claude alone and anticipated follow-up questions I had to ask Claude to get to the same level of detail."
"It drastically cuts down market research time and we know we can trust what it gives us."
300 free credits. No credit card.
Four stages, and you can open the record of every one of them.
If your question is missing context the answer depends on, Vurge asks you for it before any model starts working.
Every model gets your question at the same time and answers it without seeing the others, so no model's first answer is shaped by another's.
Each model reads the others' answers, challenges weak reasoning and unstated assumptions, and revises its own position. Rounds continue until the models agree or the round limit is reached, and any remaining disagreement is written down.
You get one answer built from the points that held up in review. Every round, agreement, and disagreement stays available to read.
Add your files to a project once, and every model in the debate reads all of them.
Your request goes to a panel of frontier models, and one reviewed answer comes back.
from openai import OpenAI client = OpenAI( base_url="https://vurge.ai/api/v1", api_key="vurge_..." ) response = client.chat.completions.create( model="vurge-standard", messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}], stream=True )Add your own OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or OpenRouter keys, and debates run under the rates and compliance terms you already have.
Choose from 300+ models for each debate agent, including GLM, Kimi, and DeepSeek, and every one goes through the same peer review.
Subscribing to ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini separately costs about $60 a month. A typical Standard debate in Vurge costs about 70 cents.
100 credits for every dollar, in any amount from $10 in $5 steps.
A typical Standard debate uses about 70 credits. Deep costs more and takes many minutes.
Custom pricing for teams of 5+ users.
Asking separately gives you three answers and leaves the comparison to you. In Vurge the models critique each other's answers and revise their positions until they agree or reach the round limit, and you get one answer that notes any remaining disagreement.
No. Credits stay in your account until you use them, and there is no monthly plan.
After the final round, Vurge writes one answer that states where the models still disagree and why. Knowing where strong models disagree is often the most useful result, because it shows which part of the decision still needs your judgment.
It reduces them, though nothing removes them completely. A fabricated fact from one model has to get past the others, and they often flag it. Disputed claims stay in the debate record, so you can check them before relying on the answer.
Vurge follows the same content policies as OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google and does not bypass their safety filters. For legal, medical, and financial decisions, use Vurge to prepare and check your research, then confirm the decision with a licensed professional.
No. You type a question the same way you would in any chat app, and Vurge runs the debate.
No, you don't need API keys or any subscription with the model providers.
Yes. Conversations are encrypted in transit and at rest, and we neither train AI models on your data nor share it with third parties. Enterprise customers can also use their own API keys, so model calls run under their own provider accounts and terms.
300 free credits. No credit card.